RAM
DDR5
DDR4
DDR3
DDR2
About the site
Menu
RAMs
RAM
DDR5
DDR4
DDR3
DDR2
About the site
en
Русский Русский English English Español Español Português Português Deutsch Deutsch Français Français Italiano Italiano Polski Polski 中文 中文 日本語 日本語
Kingston 9965525-155.A00LF 8GB
INTENSO 4GB

Kingston 9965525-155.A00LF 8GB vs INTENSO 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Kingston 9965525-155.A00LF 8GB

Kingston 9965525-155.A00LF 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
INTENSO 4GB

INTENSO 4GB

Differences Specifications Comments

Differences

Kingston 9965525-155.A00LF 8GB Reasons to consider
Kingston 9965525-155.A00LF 8GB
Report a bug
INTENSO 4GB Reasons to consider
INTENSO 4GB
Report a bug
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    36 left arrow 69
    Around -92% lower latency
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    12.1 left arrow 6.4
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    9.3 left arrow 3.7
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    17000 left arrow 10600
    Around 1.6 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Kingston 9965525-155.A00LF 8GB
INTENSO 4GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR3 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    69 left arrow 36
  • Read speed, GB/s
    6.4 left arrow 12.1
  • Write speed, GB/s
    3.7 left arrow 9.3
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    10600 left arrow 17000
Other
  • Description
    PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 left arrow PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16
  • Timings / Clock speed
    7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz left arrow 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    1129 left arrow 2061

Kingston 9965525-155.A00LF 8GB RAM comparisons

SK Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 2GB
Samsung M391B5773DH0-CK0 2GB

INTENSO 4GB RAM comparisons

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB
Hoodisk Electronics Co Ltd GKE160SO102408-2666 16GB
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons