RAM
DDR5
DDR4
DDR3
DDR2
About the site
Menu
RAMs
RAM
DDR5
DDR4
DDR3
DDR2
About the site
en
Русский Русский English English Español Español Português Português Deutsch Deutsch Français Français Italiano Italiano Polski Polski 中文 中文 日本語 日本語
Mushkin 991586 2GB
Kingston KKN2NM-MIE 4GB

Mushkin 991586 2GB vs Kingston KKN2NM-MIE 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Mushkin 991586 2GB

Mushkin 991586 2GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Kingston KKN2NM-MIE 4GB

Kingston KKN2NM-MIE 4GB

Differences Specifications Comments

Differences

Mushkin 991586 2GB Reasons to consider
Mushkin 991586 2GB
Report a bug
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    26 left arrow 38
    Around 32% lower latency
Kingston KKN2NM-MIE 4GB Reasons to consider
Kingston KKN2NM-MIE 4GB
Report a bug
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    14.9 left arrow 13.8
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    11.2 left arrow 7.9
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    21300 left arrow 10600
    Around 2.01 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Mushkin 991586 2GB
Kingston KKN2NM-MIE 4GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR3 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    26 left arrow 38
  • Read speed, GB/s
    13.8 left arrow 14.9
  • Write speed, GB/s
    7.9 left arrow 11.2
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    10600 left arrow 21300
Other
  • Description
    PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 left arrow PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
  • Timings / Clock speed
    7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz left arrow 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    2156 left arrow 2174

Mushkin 991586 2GB RAM comparisons

Mushkin 999015 4GB
Samsung M471A1K1KBB1-CRC 8GB

Kingston KKN2NM-MIE 4GB RAM comparisons

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB
STEC (Silicon Tech) S1024R3NN2QK-I 1GB
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons