RAM comparison Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB vs Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4BL.M16FE 16GB

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB vs Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4BL.M16FE 16GB

Overall score

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4BL.M16FE 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

28 106

Around -279% lower latency
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 5300

Around 4.02 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4BL.M16FE 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC-5300, PS1: 1.5V, PS2: 1.8V, CAS Supported: 3 4 5 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed

no data 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

734 3860

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns