RAM comparison Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB vs Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4RL.M16FE 16GB

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB vs Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4RL.M16FE 16GB

Overall score

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4RL.M16FE 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

29 39

Around -34% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

17.6 14.4

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

16.0 9.4

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 19200

Around 1.11 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB

Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4RL.M16FE 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1966 3678

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns