RAM comparison Ramaxel Technology RMSA3320KE78HAF-3200 8GB vs Crucial Technology CT8G48C40U5.M4A1 8GB

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3320KE78HAF-3200 8GB vs Crucial Technology CT8G48C40U5.M4A1 8GB

Overall score

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3320KE78HAF-3200 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3320KE78HAF-3200 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

29 33

Around 12% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

16.1 14.8

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

14.1 11.4

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 19200

Around 1.33% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT8G48C40U5.M4A1 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3320KE78HAF-3200 8GB

Crucial Technology CT8G48C40U5.M4A1 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 26 28 30 32 36 40 42
Timings / Clock speed

20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz no data / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3285 2812

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns