RAM comparison Ramaxel Technology RMT3020EC58E9F1333 4GB vs Chun Well Technology Holding Limited CL22-22-22 D4-3200 16GB

Ramaxel Technology RMT3020EC58E9F1333 4GB vs Chun Well Technology Holding Limited CL22-22-22 D4-3200 16GB

Overall score

Ramaxel Technology RMT3020EC58E9F1333 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMT3020EC58E9F1333 4GB

Reasons to consider
Chun Well Technology Holding Limited CL22-22-22 D4-3200 16GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

16.7 9

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

14.6 5.7

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 10600

Around 2.42 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Ramaxel Technology RMT3020EC58E9F1333 4GB

Chun Well Technology Holding Limited CL22-22-22 D4-3200 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1274 3509

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns