RAM comparison Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 4GB vs Crucial Technology CT51264BA160B.C16F 4GB

Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 4GB vs Crucial Technology CT51264BA160B.C16F 4GB

Overall score

Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 4GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT51264BA160B.C16F 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

41 48

Around -17% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.3 8.9

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

9.4 5.9

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

12800 10600

Around 1.21 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 4GB

Crucial Technology CT51264BA160B.C16F 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1420 2142

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns