RAM comparison Unifosa Corporation HU564404EP0200 4GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 16GB

Unifosa Corporation HU564404EP0200 4GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 16GB

Overall score

Unifosa Corporation HU564404EP0200 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Unifosa Corporation HU564404EP0200 4GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 16GB

Faster write speed, GB/s

9.7 9.5

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

17000 12800

Around 1.33 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Unifosa Corporation HU564404EP0200 4GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2354 2302

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns