RAM comparison Kingston 99U5595-005.A00LF 2GB vs Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Kingston 99U5595-005.A00LF 2GB vs Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Overall score

Kingston 99U5595-005.A00LF 2GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Kingston 99U5595-005.A00LF 2GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

26 186

Around 86% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

13.2 3.9

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

7.3 2.0

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Kingston 99U5595-005.A00LF 2GB

Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1489 536

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns