RAM comparison Kingston 99P5471-002.AOOLF 4GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMR5030ED58E8W1600 2GB

Kingston 99P5471-002.AOOLF 4GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMR5030ED58E8W1600 2GB

Overall score

Kingston 99P5471-002.AOOLF 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Kingston 99P5471-002.AOOLF 4GB

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMR5030ED58E8W1600 2GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.5 9.7

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

8.7 5.3

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

12800 10600

Around 1.21 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Kingston 99P5471-002.AOOLF 4GB

Ramaxel Technology RMR5030ED58E8W1600 2GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1682 2360

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns