RAM comparison Chun Well Technology Holding Limited CL16-20-20 D4-3200 32GB vs Corsair CMK32GX5M2B5600C36 16GB

Chun Well Technology Holding Limited CL16-20-20 D4-3200 32GB vs Corsair CMK32GX5M2B5600C36 16GB

Overall score

Chun Well Technology Holding Limited CL16-20-20 D4-3200 32GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Chun Well Technology Holding Limited CL16-20-20 D4-3200 32GB

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK32GX5M2B5600C36 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

27 30

Around -11% lower latency
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Chun Well Technology Holding Limited CL16-20-20 D4-3200 32GB

Corsair CMK32GX5M2B5600C36 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 14 15 16 PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 28 30 32 36 40 42
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz no data / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3473 3576

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns