RAM comparison Corsair CMK128GX4M4E3200C16 32GB vs Crucial Technology BLS16G4D26BFSB.16FBD 16GB

Corsair CMK128GX4M4E3200C16 32GB vs Crucial Technology BLS16G4D26BFSB.16FBD 16GB

Overall score

Corsair CMK128GX4M4E3200C16 32GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK128GX4M4E3200C16 32GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS16G4D26BFSB.16FBD 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

22 44

Around -100% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

17.9 14.2

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 17000

Around 1.25 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMK128GX4M4E3200C16 32GB

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D26BFSB.16FBD 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3145 3152

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns