RAM comparison Corsair CMSO4GX3M1C1600C11 4GB vs Crucial Technology CT51264BC1067.M16F 4GB

Corsair CMSO4GX3M1C1600C11 4GB vs Crucial Technology CT51264BC1067.M16F 4GB

Overall score

Corsair CMSO4GX3M1C1600C11 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMSO4GX3M1C1600C11 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

28 31

Around 10% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

12.6 8.8

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

8.3 5.1

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

12800 8500

Around 1.51% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT51264BC1067.M16F 4GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMSO4GX3M1C1600C11 4GB

Crucial Technology CT51264BC1067.M16F 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 6 7 9 11 PC3-8500, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 7-7-7-20 / 1066 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2112 1423

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns