RAM comparison Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C11 4GB vs King Tiger Technology TMKU8G868-240U 8GB

Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C11 4GB vs King Tiger Technology TMKU8G868-240U 8GB

Overall score

Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C11 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C11 4GB

Reasons to consider
King Tiger Technology TMKU8G868-240U 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

20 39

Around -95% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

18.2 12.1

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

14.9 9.8

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 10600

Around 1.81 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C11 4GB

King Tiger Technology TMKU8G868-240U 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 9 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2453 3321

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns