RAM comparison Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4B.16FD 16GB vs Kingston KF552C40-16 16GB

Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4B.16FD 16GB vs Kingston KF552C40-16 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4B.16FD 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4B.16FD 16GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

17.2 15.5

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

14.5 13.2

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 19200

Around 1.11% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Kingston KF552C40-16 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4B.16FD 16GB

Kingston KF552C40-16 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 26 28 30 32 36 40 42
Timings / Clock speed

17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz no data / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3505 3343

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns