RAM comparison Crucial Technology BLS16G4S240FSD.16FD 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FJ 16GB

Crucial Technology BLS16G4S240FSD.16FD 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FJ 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BLS16G4S240FSD.16FD 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS16G4S240FSD.16FD 16GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FJ 16GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

15.2 14.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 19200

Around 1.33 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BLS16G4S240FSD.16FD 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FJ 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2457 2597

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns