Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB
Corsair CMSX64GX4M2A3200C22 32GB

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB vs Corsair CMSX64GX4M2A3200C22 32GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Corsair CMSX64GX4M2A3200C22 32GB

Corsair CMSX64GX4M2A3200C22 32GB

Differences

  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    26 left arrow 53
    Around 51% lower latency
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    17.9 left arrow 15.4
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    14.7 left arrow 13.7
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    25600 left arrow 17000
    Around 1.51 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB
Corsair CMSX64GX4M2A3200C22 32GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR4 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    26 left arrow 53
  • Read speed, GB/s
    17.9 left arrow 15.4
  • Write speed, GB/s
    14.7 left arrow 13.7
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    17000 left arrow 25600
Other
  • Description
    PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 left arrow PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
  • Timings / Clock speed
    14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz left arrow 20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    3705 left arrow 2863
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons