Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260KC78HAF-2666 8GB

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260KC78HAF-2666 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260KC78HAF-2666 8GB

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260KC78HAF-2666 8GB

Differences

  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    26 left arrow 46
    Around 43% lower latency
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    17.9 left arrow 13.4
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    14.7 left arrow 7.2
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    21300 left arrow 17000
    Around 1.25 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260KC78HAF-2666 8GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR4 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    26 left arrow 46
  • Read speed, GB/s
    17.9 left arrow 13.4
  • Write speed, GB/s
    14.7 left arrow 7.2
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    17000 left arrow 21300
Other
  • Description
    PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 left arrow PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
  • Timings / Clock speed
    14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz left arrow 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    3705 left arrow 1854
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons