RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT102464BA160B.M16 8GB vs Ramos Technology RMB4GB58BCA3-13HC 4GB

Crucial Technology CT102464BA160B.M16 8GB vs Ramos Technology RMB4GB58BCA3-13HC 4GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT102464BA160B.M16 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT102464BA160B.M16 8GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

12.6 11.6

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

7.8 5.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

12800 10600

Around 1.21% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Ramos Technology RMB4GB58BCA3-13HC 4GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT102464BA160B.M16 8GB

Ramos Technology RMB4GB58BCA3-13HC 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2209 1751

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns