RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA266.C8FB 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA266.C8FB 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA266.C8FB 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA266.C8FB 16GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.3 12.3

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

11.1 9.7

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 17000

Around 1.25% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA266.C8FB 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Timings / Clock speed

17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2656 2302

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns