RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FJ 16GB vs Kingston KVR26N19D8/16 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FJ 16GB vs Kingston KVR26N19D8/16 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FJ 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FJ 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

42 54

Around 22% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

15.2 7.6

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

9.5 7.7

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 21300

Around 1.2% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Kingston KVR26N19D8/16 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FJ 16GB

Kingston KVR26N19D8/16 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed

20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2597 1611

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns