Crucial Technology CT25664BA160B.C16F 2GB
Corsair CMSO16GX4M2A2133C15 8GB

Crucial Technology CT25664BA160B.C16F 2GB vs Corsair CMSO16GX4M2A2133C15 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology CT25664BA160B.C16F 2GB

Crucial Technology CT25664BA160B.C16F 2GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Corsair CMSO16GX4M2A2133C15 8GB

Corsair CMSO16GX4M2A2133C15 8GB

Differences

  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    29 left arrow 35
    Around 17% lower latency
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    14.3 left arrow 14.2
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    10.5 left arrow 10.1
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    17000 left arrow 12800
    Around 1.33 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology CT25664BA160B.C16F 2GB
Corsair CMSO16GX4M2A2133C15 8GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR3 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    29 left arrow 35
  • Read speed, GB/s
    14.3 left arrow 14.2
  • Write speed, GB/s
    10.1 left arrow 10.5
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    12800 left arrow 17000
Other
  • Description
    PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 left arrow PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19
  • Timings / Clock speed
    9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz left arrow 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    2227 left arrow 2460
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons