RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT51264BF160B.C16F 4GB vs Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 4GB

Crucial Technology CT51264BF160B.C16F 4GB vs Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 4GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT51264BF160B.C16F 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT51264BF160B.C16F 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

42 48

Around 13% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

12.8 8.9

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

9.0 5.9

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

12800 10600

Around 1.21% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 4GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT51264BF160B.C16F 4GB

Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2011 1420

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns