RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FE 8GB vs SK Hynix 8GB36-H9 8GB

Crucial Technology CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FE 8GB vs SK Hynix 8GB36-H9 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FE 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FE 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

29 30

Around 3% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

16.1 10.7

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

13.1 9.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 10600

Around 2.42% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
SK Hynix 8GB36-H9 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FE 8GB

SK Hynix 8GB36-H9 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9
Timings / Clock speed

20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz 7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3072 2197

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns