RAM comparison Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB vs Corsair CMK32GX5M2A4800C40 16GB

Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB vs Corsair CMK32GX5M2A4800C40 16GB

Overall score

Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK32GX5M2A4800C40 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

28 374

Around -1236% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

14 0.8

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

12.3 1.0

Average value in the tests

Complete list of technical specifications

Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Corsair CMK32GX5M2A4800C40 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 28 30 32 36 40 42
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz no data / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

269 3335

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns