RAM comparison Kingston KF560C40-16 16GB vs Corsair CMX16GX3M2A1333C9 8GB

Kingston KF560C40-16 16GB vs Corsair CMX16GX3M2A1333C9 8GB

Overall score

Kingston KF560C40-16 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Kingston KF560C40-16 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

24 42

Around 43% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.8 13.4

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

13.0 8.0

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 10600

Around 1.81% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMX16GX3M2A1333C9 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Kingston KF560C40-16 16GB

Corsair CMX16GX3M2A1333C9 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 26 28 30 32 36 40 42 PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 9
Timings / Clock speed

no data / 2400 MHz 7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3524 2303

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns