Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB
Corsair CMU16GX4M2D3200C16 8GB

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB vs Corsair CMU16GX4M2D3200C16 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Corsair CMU16GX4M2D3200C16 8GB

Corsair CMU16GX4M2D3200C16 8GB

Differences

  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    3 left arrow 17.6
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    2,069.2 left arrow 13.0
    Average value in the tests
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    22 left arrow 106
    Around -382% lower latency
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    17000 left arrow 5300
    Around 3.21 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB
Corsair CMU16GX4M2D3200C16 8GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR2 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    106 left arrow 22
  • Read speed, GB/s
    3,273.7 left arrow 17.6
  • Write speed, GB/s
    2,069.2 left arrow 13.0
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    5300 left arrow 17000
Other
  • Description
    PC-5300, PS1: 1.5V, PS2: 1.8V, CAS Supported: 3 4 5 left arrow PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
  • Timings / Clock speed
    no data left arrow 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    734 left arrow 3060
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons