RAM comparison Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260NA78HAF-2666 8GB vs Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBR 16GB

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260NA78HAF-2666 8GB vs Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBR 16GB

Overall score

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260NA78HAF-2666 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260NA78HAF-2666 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

42 45

Around 7% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

13.3 13.2

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 19200

Around 1.11% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBR 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260NA78HAF-2666 8GB

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBR 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20
Timings / Clock speed

17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2181 2841

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns