RAM comparison Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB vs Crucial Technology CT8G4DFS632A.M4FB 8GB

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB vs Crucial Technology CT8G4DFS632A.M4FB 8GB

Overall score

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT8G4DFS632A.M4FB 8GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

18 14.4

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

11.0 9.4

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 19200

Around 1.33 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB

Crucial Technology CT8G4DFS632A.M4FB 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 28
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1966 2813

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns