RAM comparison Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB vs Kingston 9965604-008.C00G 8GB

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB vs Kingston 9965604-008.C00G 8GB

Overall score

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

39 47

Around 17% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.4 11

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

9.4 8.9

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Kingston 9965604-008.C00G 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB

Kingston 9965604-008.C00G 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1966 2341

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns