RAM comparison Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 8GB vs Crucial Technology 16G4UD2400.C16BD1 16GB

Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 8GB vs Crucial Technology 16G4UD2400.C16BD1 16GB

Overall score

Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 8GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology 16G4UD2400.C16BD1 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

24 30

Around -25% lower latency
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 8GB

Crucial Technology 16G4UD2400.C16BD1 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3491 2654

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns