RAM comparison Apacer Technology 78.A1GA0.9L4 2GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FB 16GB

Apacer Technology 78.A1GA0.9L4 2GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FB 16GB

Overall score

Apacer Technology 78.A1GA0.9L4 2GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Apacer Technology 78.A1GA0.9L4 2GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FB 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

35 111

Around -217% lower latency
Faster write speed, GB/s

13.6 1,765.7

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 6400

Around 4 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Apacer Technology 78.A1GA0.9L4 2GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FB 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 3 4 5 PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28
Timings / Clock speed

5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz 20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

461 3423

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns