RAM comparison Corsair CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 16GB

Corsair CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 16GB

Overall score

Corsair CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 16GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

18.3 14.4

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

15.3 12.3

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 19200

Around 1.11% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 26 28 30 32 36 40 42
Timings / Clock speed

17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz no data / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3708 3392

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns