RAM comparison Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 16GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 8GB

Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 16GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

29 36

Around 19% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

20 13.6

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

15.9 9.9

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 19200

Around 1.11% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 16GB

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Timings / Clock speed

17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3713 2360

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns