RAM comparison Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FD 16GB vs Crucial Technology BLE8G3D1869DE1TX0. 8GB

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FD 16GB vs Crucial Technology BLE8G3D1869DE1TX0. 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FD 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FD 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

31 37

Around 16% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

17 15.3

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

12.5 9.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 10600

Around 1.81% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLE8G3D1869DE1TX0. 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FD 16GB

Crucial Technology BLE8G3D1869DE1TX0. 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3282 2640

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns