RAM comparison Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSC.16FBR 16GB vs Crucial Technology BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 8GB

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSC.16FBR 16GB vs Crucial Technology BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSC.16FBR 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSC.16FBR 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

33 38

Around 13% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

16.3 14.8

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

12.8 9.3

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 12800

Around 1.5% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSC.16FBR 16GB

Crucial Technology BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3202 2567

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns