RAM comparison Crucial Technology CB16GS2666.C8ET 16GB vs SK Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB

Crucial Technology CB16GS2666.C8ET 16GB vs SK Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CB16GS2666.C8ET 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CB16GS2666.C8ET 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

32 37

Around 14% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

15 13.9

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

10.3 9.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 19200

Around 1.11% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
SK Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CB16GS2666.C8ET 16GB

SK Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Timings / Clock speed

17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2895 2461

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns