RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B.C16 8GB vs Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4W.M16FE1 16GB

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B.C16 8GB vs Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4W.M16FE1 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B.C16 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B.C16 8GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4W.M16FE1 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

28 44

Around -57% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

18.2 12.6

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

15.1 8.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 12800

Around 1.66 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B.C16 8GB

Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4W.M16FE1 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2193 3666

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns