RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FN 16GB vs Corsair CM5S16GM4800A40K2 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FN 16GB vs Corsair CM5S16GM4800A40K2 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FN 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FN 16GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.9 13.4

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 19200

Around 1.33% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Corsair CM5S16GM4800A40K2 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FN 16GB

Corsair CM5S16GM4800A40K2 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 28 30 32 36 40 42
Timings / Clock speed

20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz no data / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2771 3436

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns