Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB
Chun Well Technology Holding Limited D4U1636144B 16GB

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB vs Chun Well Technology Holding Limited D4U1636144B 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Chun Well Technology Holding Limited D4U1636144B 16GB

Chun Well Technology Holding Limited D4U1636144B 16GB

Differences

  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    4 left arrow 23.7
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    2,378.6 left arrow 18.3
    Average value in the tests
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    26 left arrow 62
    Around -138% lower latency
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    19200 left arrow 6400
    Around 3 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB
Chun Well Technology Holding Limited D4U1636144B 16GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR2 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    62 left arrow 26
  • Read speed, GB/s
    4,670.6 left arrow 23.7
  • Write speed, GB/s
    2,378.6 left arrow 18.3
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    6400 left arrow 19200
Other
  • Description
    PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5 6 left arrow PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
  • Timings / Clock speed
    5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz left arrow 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    861 left arrow 4124
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons