Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB
Galaxy Microsystems Ltd. GOC2017-Fugger 8GB

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB vs Galaxy Microsystems Ltd. GOC2017-Fugger 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Galaxy Microsystems Ltd. GOC2017-Fugger 8GB

Galaxy Microsystems Ltd. GOC2017-Fugger 8GB

Differences

  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    3 left arrow 20.5
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    2,069.2 left arrow 10.1
    Average value in the tests
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    52 left arrow 106
    Around -104% lower latency
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    17000 left arrow 5300
    Around 3.21 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB
Galaxy Microsystems Ltd. GOC2017-Fugger 8GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR2 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    106 left arrow 52
  • Read speed, GB/s
    3,273.7 left arrow 20.5
  • Write speed, GB/s
    2,069.2 left arrow 10.1
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    5300 left arrow 17000
Other
  • Description
    PC-5300, PS1: 1.5V, PS2: 1.8V, CAS Supported: 3 4 5 left arrow PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
  • Timings / Clock speed
    no data left arrow 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    734 left arrow 2472
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons