Ramaxel Technology RMT3170EB68F9W1600 4GB
Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSE.16FAD 16GB

Ramaxel Technology RMT3170EB68F9W1600 4GB vs Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSE.16FAD 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Ramaxel Technology RMT3170EB68F9W1600 4GB

Ramaxel Technology RMT3170EB68F9W1600 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSE.16FAD 16GB

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSE.16FAD 16GB

Differences

  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    31 left arrow 43
    Around -39% lower latency
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    16.3 left arrow 11.4
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    11.1 left arrow 7.7
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    19200 left arrow 12800
    Around 1.5 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Ramaxel Technology RMT3170EB68F9W1600 4GB
Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSE.16FAD 16GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR3 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    43 left arrow 31
  • Read speed, GB/s
    11.4 left arrow 16.3
  • Write speed, GB/s
    7.7 left arrow 11.1
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    12800 left arrow 19200
Other
  • Description
    PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 left arrow PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20
  • Timings / Clock speed
    9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz left arrow 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    1823 left arrow 2995
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons