RAM comparison Ramaxel Technology RMT3170MP68F9F1600 4GB vs AMD R538G1601S2LS 8GB

Ramaxel Technology RMT3170MP68F9F1600 4GB vs AMD R538G1601S2LS 8GB

Overall score

Ramaxel Technology RMT3170MP68F9F1600 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMT3170MP68F9F1600 4GB

Reasons to consider
AMD R538G1601S2LS 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

28 126

Around -350% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

11.3 5

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

8.2 3.1

Average value in the tests

Complete list of technical specifications

Ramaxel Technology RMT3170MP68F9F1600 4GB

AMD R538G1601S2LS 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

704 1793

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns