RAM comparison Samsung 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 8GB vs Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Samsung 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 8GB vs Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Overall score

Samsung 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Samsung 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 8GB

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

30 65

Around -117% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

18.1 6.8

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

14.2 5.4

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

17000 14900

Around 1.14 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Samsung 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 8GB

Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-14900, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Timings / Clock speed

9-10-9-28 / 1866 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1370 3550

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns