RAM comparison Shanghai Kuxin Microelectronics Ltd NMUD480E82-2666 8GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBR 16GB

Shanghai Kuxin Microelectronics Ltd NMUD480E82-2666 8GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBR 16GB

Overall score

Shanghai Kuxin Microelectronics Ltd NMUD480E82-2666 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Shanghai Kuxin Microelectronics Ltd NMUD480E82-2666 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

22 35

Around 37% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

17.7 14.5

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

12.7 10.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 19200

Around 1.11% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBR 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Shanghai Kuxin Microelectronics Ltd NMUD480E82-2666 8GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBR 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20
Timings / Clock speed

17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3075 2664

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns