RAM comparison SK Hynix HYMP31GF72CMP4D5Y5 8GB vs ATP Electronics Inc. X4C16QE8BNRCME-E-LI1 16GB

SK Hynix HYMP31GF72CMP4D5Y5 8GB vs ATP Electronics Inc. X4C16QE8BNRCME-E-LI1 16GB

Overall score

SK Hynix HYMP31GF72CMP4D5Y5 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
SK Hynix HYMP31GF72CMP4D5Y5 8GB

Reasons to consider
ATP Electronics Inc. X4C16QE8BNRCME-E-LI1 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

37 117

Around -216% lower latency
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 5300

Around 3.62 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

SK Hynix HYMP31GF72CMP4D5Y5 8GB

ATP Electronics Inc. X4C16QE8BNRCME-E-LI1 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC-5300, PS1: 1.5V, PS2: 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Timings / Clock speed

no data 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

784 3448

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns