RAM comparison Corsair CM4X16GC3000C16K4D 16GB vs Neo Forza NMUD480E86-3200 8GB

Corsair CM4X16GC3000C16K4D 16GB vs Neo Forza NMUD480E86-3200 8GB

Overall score

Corsair CM4X16GC3000C16K4D 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CM4X16GC3000C16K4D 16GB

Reasons to consider
Neo Forza NMUD480E86-3200 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

24 30

Around -25% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

20.1 17.6

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

16.1 13.3

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CM4X16GC3000C16K4D 16GB

Neo Forza NMUD480E86-3200 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3429 3778

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns