RAM comparison Corsair CMT32GX5M2X5600C36 16GB vs Crucial Technology BL8G26C16U4R.8FD 8GB

Corsair CMT32GX5M2X5600C36 16GB vs Crucial Technology BL8G26C16U4R.8FD 8GB

Overall score

Corsair CMT32GX5M2X5600C36 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMT32GX5M2X5600C36 16GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BL8G26C16U4R.8FD 8GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

15.7 15.2

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 19200

Around 1.11 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMT32GX5M2X5600C36 16GB

Crucial Technology BL8G26C16U4R.8FD 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 28 30 32 36 40 42 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20
Timings / Clock speed

no data / 2400 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3599 3159

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns