RAM comparison Crucial Technology 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 8GB vs Crucial Technology CT51264BD160B.C16F 4GB

Crucial Technology 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 8GB vs Crucial Technology CT51264BD160B.C16F 4GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

23 41

Around 44% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

15.9 13.9

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

11.1 9.7

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

14900 12800

Around 1.16% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT51264BD160B.C16F 4GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 8GB

Crucial Technology CT51264BD160B.C16F 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-14900, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11
Timings / Clock speed

9-10-9-28 / 1866 MHz 9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2892 2366

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns