RAM comparison Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4R.16FE 16GB vs Corsair CMK32GX5M2B5600C36 16GB

Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4R.16FE 16GB vs Corsair CMK32GX5M2B5600C36 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4R.16FE 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4R.16FE 16GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

17.1 15.7

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 19200

Around 1.11% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK32GX5M2B5600C36 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4R.16FE 16GB

Corsair CMK32GX5M2B5600C36 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 28 30 32 36 40 42
Timings / Clock speed

17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz no data / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3384 3576

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns